Alexander Duncan
University: Northeastern University
State: Texas
Organizations:
Related Profiles: No Related Profiles
Alexander Duncan has recently gotten under the spotlight for sharing hateful, Islamophobic, and degrading statements. These include hateful and derogatory language, AI-generated visuals, and other content that directly promotes anti-Muslim sentiment and risks inciting real-world harm. On his public profile, Alexander Duncan describes himself as “Republican U.S. Senate Candidate, Texas 2026. Dedicated to defending the Constitution, putting America First, and keeping Texas strong and independent”.
Duncan Sharing Islamophobic Rhetoric and Its Harmful Impact
Alexander Duncan, a public figure with a large number of followers, endorses comments calling for Islam to be banned in the United States. The exchange raises serious concerns about religious freedom, discrimination, and the use of social media to amplify bigoted rhetoric.
This portrayal is a textbook example of disinformation and religious bigotry.
- Taken out of historical context,
- Mistranslated or fabricated,
- Cherry-picked to paint a religion followed by over 1.9 billion people as inherently violent.
Duncan’s posts are not just offensive; they are a dangerous act of misrepresentation that feeds a climate of suspicion, fear, and hostility toward an entire religious community.
Christian Nationalism and the Threat to Religious Freedom
Senate candidate Alexander Duncan recently tweeted, “Jesus Christ is the only way, truth, and the life” a widely recognized Christian affirmation. But in the context of his broader online presence, which includes calls to ban Islam, distorted Quranic citations, and endorsements of anti-Muslim rhetoric, the statement reads less as a personal expression of faith and more as a signal of religious exclusivism. When public accounts promote one religion while vilifying another, it crosses into the territory of religious supremacy. In a nation founded on religious freedom and pluralism, this kind of rhetoric from a political candidate is not only reckless, it’s profoundly dangerous.
Proposing a blanket ban on any religion fundamentally contradicts the core values of the U.S. Constitution. Statements like this move beyond personal opinion into the realm of dangerous authoritarian rhetoric, normalizing the idea that religious minorities can be stripped of their rights.
Explicit Speech and Hate-Fueled Comments
Another tweet made by Alexander Duncan distorts both the legal process and the practice of Islam, perpetuating harmful stereotypes. Misrepresenting Islamic law as oppressive toward women only deepens division and fuels Islamophobia, ultimately undermining trust in both the justice system and Muslim communities.
In another tweet, Alexander Duncan stated that “Islam is not a religion” and that its goal is to “conquer the US and implement their own form of governance through Sharia law.” This statement is a gross distortion of both Islamic teachings and the reality of Muslim communities. Islam, like any religion, is centered on faith and spiritual practice, not a political agenda to overthrow governments. Such rhetoric promotes baseless fears and conspiracy theories that fuel Islamophobia. Duncan’s comments contribute to a dangerous narrative that paints an entire religion and its followers as a threat, fostering division and hostility without any factual basis.
Below we will list some statements made by Alexander Duncan that are deeply Islamophobic and hate-fueled:
- Muslims are obligated to hate non-Muslims, yet our government is welcoming them here with open arms. We must keep Islam out of America!
- “Islam will leverage the Constitution only until it destroys it.” It is time to ban Islam, a governmental system, masking itself as a religion to subvert our constitution!
- “Islam is better than democracy.” That quote says it all, Islam is not a religion, it’s a governmental system that wants to conquer and destroy America.
- This is Islam, this is Sharia law. It is evil, disgusting, demonic, barbaric, and has no business being in America.
Alexander Duncan’s public statements and actions reveal a disturbing pattern of Islamophobic rhetoric and misinformation. His repeated endorsements of discriminatory views, including the call to ban Islam in the United States, the distortion of Islamic teachings, the promotion of baseless conspiracy theories, and offensive visuals, expose an apparent disregard for religious freedom, pluralism, and the fundamental values enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.
Duncan’s rhetoric must be recognized for what it is: an attempt to normalize religious discrimination and infringe upon the rights of individuals based on their faith. As a public figure and political candidate, his behavior undermines the very foundations of human rights and religious freedom, perpetuating harm in the name of political gain.
Alexander Duncan Socials:
Individuals
